2014년 1월 29일 수요일

political ecology and global capitalism (sugar) - For Jan 31 Assignment

Sugar is form of organic chemical which can be extracted in various plant and also all of green planets. We as human consume organic chemical so called sugar in daily life. The sugar itself was not important until the middle of the nineteenth century, yet the sugar cane became valuable source after middle nineteenth century due to first domesticated in New Guinea around 8000 B.C, and two thousand years later, the corn cane was moved to the Philippines and India, and possibly Indonesia. This is the starting point of when we use sugar in daily life.
             The sugar cane definitely relate to political ecology, since the meaning of political ecology is "political ecology is the study of the politics of environmental changes that influence the changes in socioeconomic power relations of the people in a society which may be due to natural or human induced phenomena and development", political ecology basically means politics view of environmental change that are caused by human or nature since the sugar was created by the nature and found by human, so that people  in New Guinea could cultivate sugar cane and spread all over the world in today, thus sugar cane is relate with political ecology.
             The sugar cane cannot be grown in all over the place in the world, there are certain place where sugar cane can be grown. This cause the global capitalism, global capitalism is basically means trade with anywhere in the world if it benefit you. So the country where it could produce the sugar cane select the price and make profit out of it. Thus sugar cane is also impact of global capitalism.

2014년 1월 22일 수요일

Capitalism # assignment due by Jan 24 Friday: blog post






I believe that capitalism can not be compatible with equality and social justice.
Things might look different from the view point of someone else. However,
I would like to define the capitalism as governance structure or as possessive right structure, so that companies can enter into competition with equality and share right information from its industry. But the problem is that our society cannot compete with equality. For instance, if when Nike produce 100 dollar value shoes, and if other company produce exactly same shoes or similar ones for only 50 dollars, Nike company likely to face its bankrupts. Therefore, Nike should lower its shoe price lower than the other rival company so that it can continue its business and make profits from the Nike shoe company. However, in this competitive industry, they are not able to make a freely competitive circumstance.
and I also want to define the relationship between equality and capitalism.
I believe that equality from capitalism is equality from starting line or equality from opportunity. However, this equality from capitalism is highly related to the government and politics. However, If the capitalism was enough to be compatible with equality or social justice, there should have no history such as bankrupts or IMF issues because the reasons from economy depression comes from un equality from capitalism.
Therefore, I believe that capitalism can not be compatible with equality and justice.

2014년 1월 20일 월요일

Hello

Hello my name is Lina Kim
I am from south korea and currently attending University of Arizona, as sophomore.
My major is Economics from Pre-Business.
I love listening to musics, and sharing my thoughts with other people.
However, Let's have Fun this spring semester !